By Mark Derewicz
Spencer Smith, PhD, peers through a microscope of his own creation, trying to home in on a single neuron. The cell is tiny, about 0.015 millimeters in diameter. He attempts to clamp a microscopic pipette directly onto the neuron’s dendrite—an arm-like extension of the cell. He wants to explore its function in greater detail than anyone has ever done. It’s tedious work that requires otherworldly patience, a lot of time, and a powerful microscope. Finally, Smith manages to connect the pipette. Then, he listens and he looks.
Eventually, he witnesses a spike of current. The dendrite in the brain of a live mouse has fired an independent electrical signal. That is, the signal wasn’t created elsewhere and then appeared in the dendrite. To a neuroscientist, this is big news. To anyone interested in how the brain works, this should be surprising news. Scientists had long thought that dendrites were merely the passive circuits that transmit electrical signals from synapse to the main cell bodies of neurons. Smith’s research shows that when a mammal is making sense of visual information, dendrites can actually create the signals to process that information themselves. Turns out, dendrites aren’t just wiring in the brain—which scientists had thought for decades. Dendrites are like mini-neural computers.
“Imagine you’re reverse engineering a piece of alien technology, and what you thought was simple wiring turns out to be transistors that compute information, said Smith, an assistant professor of cell biology and physiology and member of the UNC Neuroscience Center. “That’s what this finding is like.” Except we’re talking about the mammalian brain. “The implications are exciting to think about,” he said.
Smith’s work, which was published in the journal Nature, could provide scientists with insights into brain-related conditions, such as Timothy syndrome, a rare genetic disorder in which dendritic signals seem to go awry. And the research is changing the way scientists think about long-standing scientific models of how neural circuitry functions in the brain.
This summer, two major funders of neuroscience—the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the Simons Foundation—have turned to Smith to develop and conduct experiments with a new kind of two-photon microscope to explore the brain. Such an endeavor is in line with the BRAIN Initiative, which President Obama announced the creation of in 2013 and has the ultimate goal of mapping every neuron in the human brain. Smith has already created a prototype and is on the way to seeing, in detail for the first time, how neurons interact across different brain areas while processing visual information.
Typically, visual cortex does its thing through the power of axons generating electrical spikes, which indicate that the neurons are processing the information we take in through the eyes. That is, when we read, axons fire, and then we understand, we think, we form new ideas.
But Smith knew that many of the same molecules that support axonal spikes are also present in dendrites. Previous researchers used dissected brain tissue of mice to show that dendrites can use those molecules to generate electrical spikes themselves—at least in a dish in a lab—but it was unclear whether normal brain activity in live animals use those dendritic spikes for anything meaningful. For example, could dendritic spikes be involved in how we see and how we process what we see?
The answer, Smith’s team found, is yes.
Directly demonstrating this required a series of intricate experiments that took years and spanned two continents, beginning in Michael Häusser’s lab at University College London, where Smith was a postdoctoral fellow before joining the UNC faculty in 2011.
Smith’s team, including his wife Ikuko Smith, PhD, a postdoctoral fellow in his lab, used patch-clamp electrophysiology to attach a microscopic glass pipette electrode—filled with a salt solution similar to that in the brain—to a neuron’s dendrite in the brain of a mouse. The idea was to directly “listen” in on the electrical signaling process.“Attaching the pipette to a dendrite is tremendously technically challenging,” Smith said. “You can’t approach the dendrite from just any direction. And you can’t see the dendrite. So you have to do this blind. It’s like fishing but all you can see is the electrical trace of a fish.” And you can’t use bait. “You just go for it and see if you can hit a dendrite,” he said. “Most of the time you can’t.”
But Smith built his own two-photon microscope system to make things easier.
“There are a few companies that sell two-photon microscopes, but they didn’t meet my specifications,” Smith said. “We’re really concerned about ergonomics because when you’re doing difficult, low-yield experiments, it’s easy to get tired, distracted, and lose focus. So it’s important to make the microscope as easy to use as possible. Also, it has to have high sensitivity.”
That’s where the two photons come in.
To take images of what’s going on in a neuron, Smith uses bursts of light so intense that the cellular molecules absorbing that light can’t tell where one photon in the beam of light ends and the next one begins. The molecules absorb two photons at the same time. “That’s key to this kind of imaging,” Smith said. Brain tissue is a thicket of neuron branches and other cells that conventional microscopes can only reveal in blurry images. Two-photon microscopes can generate sharp images deep into this tissue and reveal fine neural structures. It’s his microscope’s design that makes this sort of brain research possible.
Once the pipette is attached to a dendrite, Smith’s team takes electrical recordings from individual dendrites within the brains of anesthetized and awake mice. As the mice view visual stimuli on a computer screen, the researchers can see unusual patterns of electrical signals – bursts of spikes – in the dendrite.
Further work revealed that the dendritic spikes occur selectively, depending on the visual stimulus, indicating that the dendrites process information about what the animal is seeing.
To provide visual evidence of their finding, Smith’s team fills neurons with calcium dye, which allows for an optical readout of spiking. This shows that dendrites create electrical spikes, while other parts of the neuron do not, meaning that the spikes are the result of local processing within the dendrites. They themselves are computing visual information.
“It’s as if the processing power of the brain is much greater than we had originally thought,” Smith said.
A new frontier
This work was done with his first iteration of a two-photon microscope at UNC. Version 2.0 is now under construction for a different kind of brain exploration—to record the activity of individual neurons in two different parts of the visual cortex at the same time. This has never been done before. It would allow researchers to see how different neurons interact while the brain processes information during normal conditions or disease states.
To accomplish this, Smith needed to build a microscope from scratch. His lab is designing their own custom lens systems for the magnifying optics—the stuff scientists typically buy off the shelf. Smith looked into outsourcing the optical design work, but that process was extremely slow and expensive. “So, I figured we could do this ourselves,” he said.
The National Science Foundation funded him to the tune of $300,000 as one of 36 recipients of an Early Concept Grant for Exploration Research (EAGER), and the Simons Foundation gave Smith and Princeton researcher Jonathan Pillow a $540,000 grant for three years.
Smith’s idea was to create optics and a complete magnifying system that would allow scientists to view neurons throughout the entire visual cortex of a mouse, which includes multiple brain areas. This would show researchers which neurons – and which kinds of neurons – fire as a result of visual stimuli or specific behaviors of the animals. The visual information produces neural activity that’s distributed across multiple brain areas.
“Right now, we don’t really have a good idea how that happens,” Smith said, “because current technology only reveals a single brain area at a time.”
Scientists can use nuclear magnetic resonance imaging to see which parts of the brain light up, but such magnetic methods don’t offer high resolution images of individual neurons. Smith wants to put visual stimuli in front of mice and then study their neurons to see how they fire, when they fire, and why they fire. He wants to map the interactions between neurons in the visual cortex.
“If we want to understand how the brain works, we have to be able to look at a more systems-level view of neural activity,” Smith said. “That’s what this new microscope will help us do.”
Scientists have made significant advances in understanding the pathology of certain brain disorders by linking a gene to a molecule and, then, to the faulty activity of synapses between neurons. But, Smith said, what happens to neural circuitry throughout the brain during these diseases remains poorly understood.
“Down the line, we hope to address this,” Smith said.
Smith’s first two-photon microscope was designed to view individual neurons firing over an area of 1.4 millimeters. This success proved the general approach, and his lab immediately went to work to push the envelope. When he proposed to build a microscope that allowed him to increase the field of view to at least 3.5 millimeters, which would allow him to view neurons throughout the entire visual cortex of a mouse, one grant reviewer was skeptical, saying that if this were possible, surely someone would’ve achieved it by now – especially a microscope company.
But they hadn’t.
Luckily, the other grant reviewers disagreed with their colleague and agreed to fund the project. Smith set out to design the first system to view individual neurons firing over a span of 3.5 mm, and came up with a prototype that proved his concept was feasible and proved that skeptical reviewer wrong.
“But we really need to optimize the optics on that microscope before we can use it for experiments” Smith said. “This is what the NSF grant is supporting.”
He enlisted the help of Jeffrey Stirman, PhD, a postdoctoral fellow in Smith’s lab, and Mike Kudenov, PhD, an assistant professor of electrical and computer engineering at NC State. The team is designing precisely what Smith knows he’ll need to increase his field of view in the visual cortex while also improving the resolution of the images of the neurons.
“It’s as if you’re developing a high performance car,” Smith said. “Typically you’d find a nice engine to put in it. You wouldn’t think about buying a hunk of aluminum and start drilling to make the entire thing from scratch. But that’s sort of what we’re doing to make the objectives for the microscope – the actual glass lenses that we need in order to get the performance out of the microscope that we want.”
Smith plans on finishing the construction of the microscope in the next two years.
“We think it’s this type of technology that will give us the insights we need to advance our understanding of how brain circuitry actually works, not only in normal circumstances but in disease states. That’s our goal. That’s why we’re so excited about this.”
Spencer Smith is an assistant professor in the Department of Cell Biology and Physiology in the UNC School of Medicine and a member of the UNC Neuroscience Center and the Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities.
To create his first two-photon microscope at UNC, Smith used a $300,000 grant from the Human Frontier Science Program, an international research organization funded by fourteen countries, including the United States, and the European Union.
The NSF issued 36 EAGER grants to researchers working to create technologies that will allow scientists to better understand how complex human behaviors result from neural activity inside the brain. The grants, totaling $10.8 million, were made in support of President Barrack Obama’s BRAIN Initiative, a multi-agency endeavor with the goal of creating new neurotechnologies to help scientists open new areas of investigation into how the brain works.
Read more about the NSF EAGER grants.
Mark Derewicz is the science communications manager for the UNC School of Medicine. He can be reached at email@example.com