Immunotherapy Could Be Beneficial for Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Researchers led by UNC Lineberger's Joshua Zeidner, MD, presented preliminary results from an ongoing phase II trial of the checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab and chemotherapy for relaposed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia at the 59th American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting in Atlanta.

Immunotherapy Could Be Beneficial for Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia click to enlarge UNC Lineberger’s Joshua Zeidner, MD, is an assistant professor in the UNC School of Medicine.

December 11, 2017

Media Contact: Laura Oleniacz, 919-445-4219, laura_oleniacz@med.unc.edu

University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center researchers report that pairing an immunotherapy drug with chemotherapy proved beneficial for some patients with acute myeloid leukemia whose disease did not respond to standard treatment or had relapsed.

Seven out of 18 patients with relapsed or persistent AML, or nearly 39 percent, had a complete remission following treatment with pembrolizumab, a checkpoint inhibitor, and high-dose chemotherapy. The researchers present their preliminary results from the ongoing phase II trial at the 59th American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting in Atlanta on Saturday, Dec. 9.

“I’m optimistic about the future for immunotherapy, particularly checkpoint inhibitors, in AML, and I think the future direction will be finding the right setting, and finding the right treatment sequence, in which to use them for this disease,” said UNC Lineberger’s Joshua Zeidner, MD, assistant professor in the UNC School of Medicine.

Researchers are studying whether they can achieve a complete remission in 40 percent of patients using a combination of chemotherapy followed by pembrolizumab. In an early stage of the trial, they observed responses in enough patients to expand the study to include 37 patients.

“There is no standard of care for relapsed, refractory AML, and outcomes are dismal for this patient population,” Zeidner said. “Outside of clinical trials, the conventional treatment is multi-agent, intensive cytotoxic chemotherapy.”

In their study, three patients were able to proceed to stem cell transplant, which is the best chance of cure for patients with AML, and they continued to have a complete response. Five patients received “maintenance” pembrolizumab after an initial response to combination of chemotherapy and pembrolizumab to see if the drug could improve durability of the response.

The researchers paired pembrolizumab with chemotherapy because they believed the immunotherapy drug would not be effective alone. Zeidner said patients at the time of diagnosis or relapse often need treatment right away because there is “so much disease” burden, and checkpoint inhibitors drugs, such as pembrolizumab, take time to work.

If the study achieves its endpoint of 40 percent of patients in complete remission, the researchers will focus on identifying biomarkers unique to patients who respond to pembrolizumab.

“We believe this drug is not going to be effective for every patient,” Zeidner said. “It behooves us to find the right subgroup of patients who may ultimately have good, long-term outcomes with this drug.”

Merck has provided funding for the clinical trial and biomarker correlates.

In addition to Zeidner, the other authors are Benjamin Vincent, MD; Anastasia Ivanova, PhD, Matthew Foster, MD, Catherine Coombs, MD, Katarzyna Jamieson, MD, Hendrik Van Deventer, MD, Richard Scibilia, Laura Blanchard, PA-C, Cassiopeia Frank, PA-C, Sean Gallagher, NP, Melissa Matson, NP, Katherine Pepin, NP, Lori Vaught, NP, Nancy Vogler, NP, and Jonathan Serody, MD, UNC Lineberger; and Ivana Gojo, MD, and Leo Luznik, MD, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland.

University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center researchers report that pairing an immunotherapy drug with chemotherapy proved beneficial for some patients with acute myeloid leukemia whose disease did not respond to standard treatment or had relapsed.

Seven out of 18 patients with relapsed or persistent AML, or nearly 39 percent, had a complete remission following treatment with pembrolizumab, a checkpoint inhibitor, and high-dose chemotherapy. The researchers present their preliminary results from the ongoing phase II trial at the 59th American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting in Atlanta on Saturday, Dec. 9.

“I’m optimistic about the future for immunotherapy, particularly checkpoint inhibitors, in AML, and I think the future direction will be finding the right setting, and finding the right treatment sequence, in which to use them for this disease,” said UNC Lineberger’s Joshua Zeidner, MD, assistant professor in the UNC School of Medicine.

Researchers are studying whether they can achieve a complete remission in 40 percent of patients using a combination of chemotherapy followed by pembrolizumab. In an early stage of the trial, they observed responses in enough patients to expand the study to include 37 patients.

“There is no standard of care for relapsed, refractory AML, and outcomes are dismal for this patient population,” Zeidner said. “Outside of clinical trials, the conventional treatment is multi-agent, intensive cytotoxic chemotherapy.”

In their study, three patients were able to proceed to stem cell transplant, which is the best chance of cure for patients with AML, and they continued to have a complete response. Five patients received “maintenance” pembrolizumab after an initial response to combination of chemotherapy and pembrolizumab to see if the drug could improve durability of the response.

The researchers paired pembrolizumab with chemotherapy because they believed the immunotherapy drug would not be effective alone. Zeidner said patients at the time of diagnosis or relapse often need treatment right away because there is “so much disease” burden, and checkpoint inhibitors drugs, such as pembrolizumab, take time to work.

If the study achieves its endpoint of 40 percent of patients in complete remission, the researchers will focus on identifying biomarkers unique to patients who respond to pembrolizumab.

“We believe this drug is not going to be effective for every patient,” Zeidner said. “It behooves us to find the right subgroup of patients who may ultimately have good, long-term outcomes with this drug.”

Merck has provided funding for the clinical trial and biomarker correlates.

In addition to Zeidner, the other authors are Benjamin Vincent, MD; Anastasia Ivanova, PhD, Matthew Foster, MD, Catherine Coombs, MD, Katarzyna Jamieson, MD, Hendrik Van Deventer, MD, Richard Scibilia, Laura Blanchard, PA-C, Cassiopeia Frank, PA-C, Sean Gallagher, NP, Melissa Matson, NP, Katherine Pepin, NP, Lori Vaught, NP, Nancy Vogler, NP, and Jonathan Serody, MD, UNC Lineberger; and Ivana Gojo, MD, and Leo Luznik, MD, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland.

Share This:
Filed under: , ,